Advertisement
Sunday 16th May 2pm
Castle Gardens, Swansea, Wales
It’s time to end the Genocide* of the Palestinians by the Jewish State.
And time to join the groundswell of grassroots support throughout the UK for the Palestinian people.
Joseph O’ Neill
Interfaith for Palestine UK
The Genocide of the Palestinian People:
An International Law and Human Rights Perspective
An International Law and Human Rights Perspective
While there has been recent criticism of those taking the position that Israel is committing genocide against Palestinians, there is a long history of human rights scholarship and legal analysis that supports the assertion. Prominent scholars of the international law crime of genocide and human rights authorities take the position that Israel’s policies toward the Palestinian people could constitute a form of genocide. Those policies range from the 1948 mass killing and displacement of Palestinians to a half-century of military occupation and, correspondingly, the discriminatory legal regime governing Palestinians, repeated military assaults on Gaza, and official Israeli statements expressly favouring the elimination of Palestinians.
Genocide is a term that has both sociological and legal meaning. The term genocide was coined in 1944 by a Jewish Polish legal scholar, Raphael Lemkin. For Lemkin, “the term does not necessarily signify mass killings.” He explained:
More often [genocide] refers to a coordinated plan aimed at destruction
of the essential foundations of the life of national groups so that these
groups wither and die like plants that have suffered a blight. The end
may be accomplished by the forced disintegration of political and social
of the essential foundations of the life of national groups so that these
groups wither and die like plants that have suffered a blight. The end
may be accomplished by the forced disintegration of political and social
institutions, of the culture of the people, of their language, their national
feelings and their religion. It may be accomplished by wiping out all basis
of personal security, liberty, health and dignity. When these means fail the
machine gun can always be utilized as a last resort. Genocide is directed
against a national group as an entity and the attack on individuals is only
secondary to the annihilation of the national group to which they belong.”
feelings and their religion. It may be accomplished by wiping out all basis
of personal security, liberty, health and dignity. When these means fail the
machine gun can always be utilized as a last resort. Genocide is directed
against a national group as an entity and the attack on individuals is only
secondary to the annihilation of the national group to which they belong.”
Since Lemkin’s first invocation of the term, it has gained political, social, and legal meaning. For political scientists, historians, and sociologists, genocide is “understood as a major type of collective violence, with a distinctive place in the spectrum of political violence, armed conflict, and war, of which it is usually seen as a part.”
From a legal perspective, genocide, like the crime against humanity of persecution, is an international crime distinguished by the specific intent to discriminate against a group on recognised grounds through a series of acts or omissions often reflected in and achieved through State policies. While different in degree, both genocide and persecution “[reduce] a person to their identification with or membership in a group,” but also “[attack] the group itself.”
Persecution criminalises the denial of fundamental rights for members of the group, and genocide criminalises the most extreme stage of discrimination: efforts to actually destroy the group.
According to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, genocide includes various acts “committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethical, racial or religious group” as such, including:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about
its physical destruction in whole or in part; and
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group.
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about
its physical destruction in whole or in part; and
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group.
This definition is reflected in Article 6 of the Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), which has jurisdiction over crimes occurring on the territory of the State of
Palestine since June 13, 2014.
Palestine since June 13, 2014.
The Genocide Convention was written in the aftermath of World War II and the horrors of the Holocaust, especially to deter and prevent such horrors in the future and, failing that, to punish those responsible. The Convention thus provided a legal framework that clearly identifies the essence of the crime of genocide, regardless of the political, social, or cultural permutations in which the crime may be attempted or carried out and regardless of the specific qualities, stage, or scale of the genocidal process. The Holocaust set the terms by which a form of general or pervasive violence against a group might be legitimately termed “genocide” as a general sociological concept as it need not “imply a comparison to any other specific case.”
Scholars of genocide have distinguished it as a crime different from other forms of war, killing, violence, discrimination, and repression. “Genocidal action aims not just to contain, control, or subordinate a population, but to shatter and break up its social existence. Thus genocide is defined, not by a particular form of violence, but by general and pervasive violence.” They note that settler colonial regimes are structurally prone to genocide, and may indulge in “genocidal moments” when they become frustrated by the resistance of a colonised or occupied people.
The term “genocide” has been used to describe the mass murder of Armenians by the Ottomans, Stalin’s expulsion of Chechens, Ingush Tartars, and Jews from the U.S.S.R., the removal of Jews and Hungarians from Romania, and Italy’s efforts to clear Slovenes and Croats from the Dalmatian coast. There have been successful prosecutions of individuals for genocide arising out of efforts to destroy the Tutsi population in Rwanda in 1994 and Srebrenica in Bosnia-Herzegovina in 1995.
Numerous prominent human rights authorities, advocates, and scholars have claimed that Israel’s policies and actions with respect to the Palestinian people have amounted to a form of genocide.
Expulsion and Killing of Palestinians in 1948
With respect to the creation of the Israeli state in 1948, there has been a robust
scholarly debate about whether the settlement of Jews and the expulsion of Palestinians
in Mandate Palestine could be described as genocide. Sociologist Martin Shaw, one of
the most distinguished modern scholars of genocide, has written, “We can conclude that pre-war Zionism included the development of an incipiently genocidal mentality towards
Arab society.” “Israel entered without an overarching plan, so that its specific genocidal
thrusts developed situationally and incrementally, through local as well as national
decisions. On this account, this was a partly decentred, networked genocide, developing
in interaction with the Palestinian and Arab enemy, in the context of war.”
scholarly debate about whether the settlement of Jews and the expulsion of Palestinians
in Mandate Palestine could be described as genocide. Sociologist Martin Shaw, one of
the most distinguished modern scholars of genocide, has written, “We can conclude that pre-war Zionism included the development of an incipiently genocidal mentality towards
Arab society.” “Israel entered without an overarching plan, so that its specific genocidal
thrusts developed situationally and incrementally, through local as well as national
decisions. On this account, this was a partly decentred, networked genocide, developing
in interaction with the Palestinian and Arab enemy, in the context of war.”
In 2010, the Journal of Genocide Studies hosted a conversation between Martin
Shaw and another prominent scholar of genocide, Omer Bartov, on whether the term
“genocide” could be reasonably applied to the Israeli treatment of Palestinians,
particularly the expulsion and killing of Arabs in 1948. The two scholars took very
different positions on the question, but the journal rejected complaints from some
quarters that it was an illegitimate, or worse, a bigoted question to pose and debate at
all
Shaw and another prominent scholar of genocide, Omer Bartov, on whether the term
“genocide” could be reasonably applied to the Israeli treatment of Palestinians,
particularly the expulsion and killing of Arabs in 1948. The two scholars took very
different positions on the question, but the journal rejected complaints from some
quarters that it was an illegitimate, or worse, a bigoted question to pose and debate at
all
Francis Boyle, a professor of international law, testified in 2013 that “The Palestinians have been the victims of genocide as defined by the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.” He argued that:
For over the past six and one-half decades, the Israeli government and its predecessors in law – the Zionist agencies, forces, and terrorist gangs – have ruthlessly implemented a systematic and comprehensive military, political, religious, economic, and cultural campaign with the intent to destroy in substantial part the national, ethnical, racial, and differentreligious group (Jews versus Muslims and Christians) constituting the
Palestinian people
Palestinian people
Long-Term Military Occupation of Palestinian People
When the international community ratified legal rules that would regulate the actions of occupying powers while also protecting the rights of occupied peoples and nations/states, it was understood that military occupation would be a short-lived necessity attendant to armed conflict, and that occupying forces would be withdrawn at the end of the conflict. Israel’s prolonged belligerent occupation of the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and Gaza for 50 years far exceeds the kind of occupation that animated the creation of legal rules of occupation contained in international law. Given the seemingly permanent nature of the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza, some human rights experts, including Israeli historian Ilan Pappé, have warned of an “incremental genocide” of Palestinians and the ultimate destruction of Palestinians as a national group.
This “incremental genocide” through the policies and practices that have both sustained and served as the hallmarks of Israel’s occupation is accomplished, they argue, by a normalisation of the Israeli annexation of Palestinian territory and the exile or absorption of the national group of people who identify as Palestinian. International law is clear that an occupying power may not annex the people or territory it occupies.
The late human rights lawyer and Center for Constitutional Rights Board President Michael Ratner also charged Israel with committing “incremental genocide” against the Palestinian people: “There’s no doubt again here this is ‘incremental genocide,’ as Ilan Pappé says. It’s been going on for a long time, the killings, the incredibly awful conditions of life, the expulsions that have gone on from Lydda in 1947 and ‘48, when 700 or more villages in Palestine were destroyed, and in the expulsions that continued from that time until today. It’s correct and important to label it for what it is.” He argued further, “I want to emphasize today [that] these killings are part of a broader set of inhuman acts by Israel constituting international crimes, carried out by Israel over many years, going back to at least 1947 and 1948. They include crimes that aren’t talked about that much in the media or the press, the crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and apartheid. These crimes can be prosecuted in the International Criminal Court and are defined there.”
The Russell Tribunal on Palestine, a nongovernmental “people’s body” made up of prominent international human rights experts and advocates, convened between
November 2010 and September 2014 to investigate the question of human rights
violations in the context of the Israeli occupation of the West Bank, including East
Jerusalem, and Gaza.24 It took testimony and deliberated specifically on the question of
whether Israel may have committed genocide in relation to the Palestinian people. The
jury concluded that some Israeli citizens and leaders may have been guilty in several
instances of the separate crime of incitement to genocide, which is specified in Article
3(c) of the Genocide Convention. “The cumulative effect of the long-standing regime of
collective punishment in Gaza appears to inflict conditions of life calculated to bring
about the incremental destruction of the Palestinians as a group in Gaza. The Tribunal emphasises the potential for a regime of persecution to become genocidal in effect.”
November 2010 and September 2014 to investigate the question of human rights
violations in the context of the Israeli occupation of the West Bank, including East
Jerusalem, and Gaza.24 It took testimony and deliberated specifically on the question of
whether Israel may have committed genocide in relation to the Palestinian people. The
jury concluded that some Israeli citizens and leaders may have been guilty in several
instances of the separate crime of incitement to genocide, which is specified in Article
3(c) of the Genocide Convention. “The cumulative effect of the long-standing regime of
collective punishment in Gaza appears to inflict conditions of life calculated to bring
about the incremental destruction of the Palestinians as a group in Gaza. The Tribunal emphasises the potential for a regime of persecution to become genocidal in effect.”
Military Assaults on Gazan Population
With respect to Israel’s most recent military offensive, the so-called “Operation
Protective Edge” launched against Gaza in the summer of 2014, prominent human rights
authorities expressed concern that the campaign constituted a violation of international
humanitarian law as contained in the Geneva Conventions:
Protective Edge” launched against Gaza in the summer of 2014, prominent human rights
authorities expressed concern that the campaign constituted a violation of international
humanitarian law as contained in the Geneva Conventions:
- Amnesty International issued a statement proclaiming “an International Criminal
Court (ICC) investigation is essential to break the culture of impunity which
perpetuates the commission of war crimes and crimes against humanity in
Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories. The case for such action is made
all the more compelling in the light of the ongoing serious violations of
international humanitarian law being committed by all parties to the current
hostilities in the Gaza Strip and Israel.” - The ICC has jurisdiction over genocide, and the U.N. Special Advisers on the
Prevention of Genocide issued a statement two weeks into the 2014 offensive that
they were “disturbed by the flagrant use of hate speech in the social media,
particularly against the Palestinian population,” finding that “individuals have
disseminated messages that could be dehumanising to the Palestinians and have called for the killing of members of this group,” while “remind[ing] all that
incitement to commit atrocity crimes is prohibited under international law.” - Al-Haq, the oldest Palestinian Human Rights organization, found that serious
violations of international law were committed in the course of the 2014 Israeli
offensive against Gaza. Al-Haq, along with other Palestinian human rights
organizations the Palestinian Center for Human Rights, Al-Mezan, and Aldameer,
submitted a legal file to the International Criminal Court urging it to open an
investigation and prosecution into the crimes against humanity and war crimes
committed during the course of Israel’s 2014 Gaza offensive. The crimes
suggested for prosecution by these human rights organisations include genocide. - Dozens of Holocaust survivors, together with hundreds of descendants of
Holocaust survivors and victims, accused Israel of “genocide” for the deaths of
more than 2,000 Palestinians in Gaza during the 2014 Israeli military offensive
against Gaza, “Operation Protective Edge”. - Others who have charged that Israel committed genocide during Operation Cast
Lead include Bolivian President Evo Morales, who recalled that country’s
ambassador from Israel. He stated, “What is happening in Palestine is
genocide - Author and activist Naomi Wolf wrote, “I mourn genocide in Gaza because I am
the granddaughter of a family half wiped out in a holocaust and I know genocide
when I see it.”
Israeli Government Statements Targeting Palestinians
Finally, prominent Israeli politicians have publicly called for action against the
Palestinian people that unequivocally meets the definition of genocide under the 1948
Convention. For instance, in February 2008, Matan Vilnai, Israel’s deputy defence
minister, declared that increasing tensions between the Israelis and Palestinians in the
Gaza Strip could bring on themselves what he called a shoah, or holocaust, “The more
Qassam [rocket] fire intensifies and the rockets reach a longer range, they will bring upon
themselves a bigger shoah because we will use all our might to defend ourselves.”
Advertisement
Israeli Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked posted a statement on Facebook in June 2014 claiming that “the entire Palestinian people is the enemy” and called for the destruction of Palestine, “including its elderly and its women, its cities and its villages, its property and its infrastructure.” Her post also called for the killing of Palestinian mothers who give birth to “little snakes.”
In August 2014, Moshe Feiglin, then-deputy speaker of the Israeli Knesset and member of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s ruling Likud Party, called for the destruction of Palestinian life in Gaza and offered a detailed plan for shipping Palestinians living in Gaza across the world. Specifically, he envisioned a scenario where the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) would find areas on the Sinai border to establish “tent encampments…until relevant emigration destinations are determined.” He further suggested that the IDF would then “exterminate nests of resistance, in the event that any should remain.” He subsequently wrote in an op-ed, “After the IDF completes the ‘softening’ of the targets with its fire-power, the IDF will conquer the entire Gaza, using all the means necessary to minimize any harm to our soldiers, with no other considerations.”36 He continued, “Gaza is part of our Land and we will remain there forever. Liberation of parts of our land forever is the only thing that justifies endangering our soldiers in battle to capture land. Subsequent to the elimination of terror from Gaza, it will become part of sovereign Israel and will be populated by Jews. This will also serve to ease the housing crisis in Israel. The coastal train line will be extended, as soon as possible, to reach the entire length of Gaza.”
Conclusion
Prominent human rights advocates and scholars have argued that the killings of
Palestinians and their forceful expulsion from mandate Palestine in 1948, the Israeli
occupation of the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and Gaza, and the violence and
discrimination directed at Palestinians by the Israeli government have violated a number
of human rights protections contained in international human rights law, genocide being
among them
Help keep news FREE for our readers
Supporting your local community newspaper/online news outlet is crucial now more than ever. If you believe in independent journalism, then consider making a valuable contribution by making a one-time or monthly donation. We operate in rural areas where providing unbiased news can be challenging. Read More About Supporting The South Wales Chronicle
